Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Comment manger des fruits de noni

Comment manger des fruits de noni

Conserver le jus de noni au réfrigérateur jusqu’à 3 semaines. Après 3 semaines, le jus de noni commence à fermenter. Conservez le jus de noni dans un bocal ou une cruche en verre scellé. Inscrivez la date sur l’extérieur du contenant pour vous rappeler combien de temps il a été dans le réfrigérateur.

Passer le jus de noni à travers le tamis à l’aide d’une spatule. Passez la spatule sur la surface du tamis pour que le jus de noni épais passe par les petits trous et pénètre dans la cruche en verre. Continuez ainsi jusqu’à ce que tout le jus, à l’exception des graines, soit passé au tamis. Jetez les graines.

Placer le fruit mûr de noni sur une assiette ou une planche à découper. Couper un fruit de noni peut devenir salissant, il est donc préférable de le couper sur quelque chose. De cette façon, vous po! uvez le manger sur-le-champ ou le transférer dans une assiette pour le servir.

Essayez d’associer un fruit de noni avec du sel et un fromage fort si vous n’aimez pas le goût. Saupoudrer de sel sur les tranches de noni. Ensuite, prenez une tranche de fromage et mettez-la entre vos doigts avec le noni. Mangez le fromage et le noni ensemble en une seule bouchée.

Verser le jus de noni mélangé dans un tamis placé sur une cruche en verre. Vous pouvez avoir besoin de mettre un entonnoir dans la cruche pour aider à guider le jus de noni mélangé dans celle-ci. À l’aide d’une cuillère ou d’une spatule, racler le jus de noni du mélangeur dans le tamis.

Conservez les fruits au noni à température ambiante pendant 3-4 jours. Conservez les fruits sur un comptoir ou dans un bol à l’abri de la lumière directe du soleil. Après 3-4 jours, le fruit du noni commencera à pourrir.

À l’aide d’un couteau, couper le noni en fines tranches da! ns le sens de la longueur. Couper les tranches de 0,64 cm (0,2! 5 po) d’épaisseur. Si votre fruit de noni est vraiment mûr, il peut se décomposer légèrement pendant que vous le coupez en raison de la façon dont il est pâteux. Si l’une des tranches se désagrège, il suffit de continuer à trancher les fruits.

Ajoutez du miel ou du jus de fruits à votre jus de noni si vous n’aimez pas son goût. Le miel et le jus de fruit sucreront le jus de noni, le rendant moins amer. Versez simplement votre verre de jus de noni et ajoutez ensuite du miel ou du jus de fruit au goût.

Verser le jus de noni de la cruche dans un verre et servir. Vous devriez pouvoir remplir 2 verres avec la quantité de jus de noni que vous avez faite. Si vous n’utilisez pas tout le jus de noni, scellez la cruche et placez-la dans le réfrigérateur.

Attendez que le fruit ait une peau jaune tendre et translucide avant de le manger. C’est à ce moment-là que le fruit du noni est complètement mûr. Si votre noni est dur et blanc ou vert! , il n’est pas encore mûr.

Mélanger le noni dans un mélangeur avec 1 tasse (240 mL) d’eau froide. Ne vous inquiétez pas de couper le noni avant de le mettre dans le mélangeur. Mélanger les fruits et l’eau jusqu’à ce qu’ils soient bien mélangés dans un jus épais.

Mâchez les graines dans le fruit du noni ou crachez-les. Le noni contient beaucoup de graines à l’intérieur qui peuvent être consommées en toute sécurité. Si vous ne voulez pas manger les graines, crachez-les dans une serviette ou une poubelle pendant que vous mangez les tranches de noni.

Rincer à l’eau un fruit de noni complètement mûr. Vous voulez attendre que votre fruit de noni soit mûr avant de l’utiliser pour faire du jus. Lorsque le fruit est tendre et de couleur jaune translucide, il est mûr. Si votre noni est dur et de couleur verte ou blanche, il n’est pas encore mûr.

Conservez le noni au congélateur pendant 6 à 8 mois. Mettez le noni dans ! un sac de congélation scellable et pressez l’excédent d’air avec ! vos mains. Inscrivez la date sur le sac pour savoir depuis combien de temps il est dans le congélateur.

Is marriage an institution...?

Raven Purl: Institutionalization for temporary insanity.

Torri Tippey: no

Rubye Bonnin: i used to think sonow my thought is not so much anti-marriagebut marriage for security, manipulation, controlor to "prove" one loves the otherand other reasons i find very questionable...Show more

Kara Tabian: maybe an institution for the divorce lawyer lol

Clifford Gombos: Oh, i'm not anti-marriage. But they say love is blind and marriage is an institution. Seems logical that marriage must be an institution for the blind.

Monday, June 29, 2020

Comment éviter l’arsenic dans le riz

Comment éviter l’arsenic dans le riz

Le riz est un grain très polyvalent qui peut être apprécié seul ou dans une grande variété d’aliments et de boissons. Cependant, le riz absorbe également l’arsenic pendant son processus de culture, dont une partie peut vous être transférée. Pour éviter la présence d’arsenic dans le riz, commencez par faire bouillir votre riz à ébullition complète dans beaucoup d’eau. Essayez aussi d’acheter du riz cultivé aux États-Unis, au Pakistan ou en Inde. Limiter votre consommation de riz en général ou rechercher des substituts sains et à grains entiers peut aussi vous aider.

Ajouter de l’eau dans une casserole propre dans un rapport de 6:1 de riz et d’eau. En règle générale, ajoutez 6 volumes d’eau pour 1 volume de riz dans le pot. Donc, si vous faites cuire 1 tasse (240 mL) de riz, vous devrez verser au! moins 6 tasses (1 400 mL) d’eau. Cette eau aidera à éliminer l’arsenic pendant la cuisson du riz.

Faites tremper votre riz dans l’eau toute la nuit. Versez votre riz dans une casserole. Ensuite, ajoutez de l’eau jusqu’à ce que vous ayez atteint un ratio de 6:1 pour le riz. Placez le couvercle sur la casserole. Laisser reposer le riz dans l’eau pendant au moins 6 heures.

Réduisez votre consommation d’aliments transformés contenant du riz ou du sirop de riz. Avant d’acheter un aliment préemballé à l’épicerie, retournez l’article et lisez attentivement son étiquette des ingrédients. Recherchez le riz ou ses dérivés, comme la farine ou le sirop de riz. Optez plutôt pour un produit qui utilise des édulcorants naturels autres que des édulcorants à base de riz ou des grains de remplacement.

Remettre le riz dans son pot d’origine pendant 10 minutes. Lorsque vous avez vidé l’eau, versez le riz dans la marmite. Laisser repo! ser non chauffé et non dérangé pendant au moins 10 minutes.! Vous pouvez couvrir la casserole si vous voulez conserver une partie de la chaleur. Une fois ce temps écoulé, le riz est prêt à servir et à manger.

Choisissez du riz blanc au lieu du riz brun. Si vous essayez simplement d’éviter l’arsenic, alors le riz blanc est le bon choix puisqu’il ne contient pas l’enveloppe extérieure du riz brun. C’est dans les couches extérieures qu’une grande partie de l’arsenic s’accumule. Le riz brun contient donc plus d’arsenic, car sa carapace extérieure est encore intacte.

Égoutter l’eau du riz. Installez une passoire dans l’évier. Ensuite, versez délicatement le riz et l’eau dans la passoire. Remuez légèrement le riz pour encourager toute l’eau à s’égoutter.

Limitez votre consommation de boissons à base de riz. Bien qu’elles puissent être savoureuses, les boissons qui contiennent du riz comme ingrédient contiennent des niveaux élevés d’arsenic inorganique. Le thé de riz b! run, l’alcool de riz et le lait de riz ne sont que quelques exemples de boissons qui devraient être consommées de façon minimale ou supprimées de votre alimentation. De plus, ces types de boissons ne devraient jamais être offerts aux enfants en raison de leur teneur élevée en arsenic.

Rincer le riz égoutté. Une fois les 12 heures écoulées, versez l’eau de la marmite dans l’évier à travers un tamis métallique. Une fois toute l’eau retirée, utiliser une cuillère pour mettre une partie du riz dans la passoire. Faire couler l’eau du robinet sur le riz pendant 1 minute. Ensuite, arrêtez l’eau et laissez égoutter le riz avant de le mettre de côté. Répéter l’opération avec le reste du riz.

Communiquez avec les entreprises rizicoles pour savoir si elles effectuent des analyses d’arsenic indépendantes. Consultez les coordonnées figurant sur l’emballage du riz ou faites des recherches en ligne sur le nom de l’entreprise. Ensuit! e, renseignez-vous auprès d’eux sur les normes d’essai de leurs pr! oduits. S’ils ont complété les tests d’arsenic, demandez qu’ils vous dirigent vers cette information ou qu’ils vous l’envoient par courriel.

Choisissez votre riz dans des lieux de production de haute qualité. Tous les producteurs de riz ne sont pas égaux. La quantité d’arsenic inorganique que l’on trouve dans le riz varie selon l’origine du riz. En règle générale, le riz à sushi des États-Unis et le riz basmati blanc de Californie contiennent moins d’arsenic.

Réduisez votre consommation de riz en général. Que vous trouviez un substitut exact pour votre consommation de riz ou non, le simple fait de minimiser la quantité de riz que vous mangez réduira votre exposition à l’arsenic. Pensez à la quantité de riz que vous mangez au cours d’une semaine et visez à réduire cette quantité de moitié ou plus. Cessez d’acheter du riz lorsque vous magasinez et procurez-vous plutôt d’autres céréales pour réduire la tentation d! e cuisiner avec ce produit.

Porter le riz et l’eau à ébullition pendant 30 minutes. Une fois que vous avez rempli la casserole, couvrez-la d’un couvercle et augmentez le feu à son maximum. Attendre que l’eau commence à bouillir complètement avant de baisser légèrement la température. Votre but est de maintenir une ébullition pendant au moins une demi-heure, tout en ne brûlant pas le riz à une température trop élevée.

Remplacez le riz par d’autres céréales. La plupart des recettes qui nécessitent du riz se marient très bien avec un grain de substitution, comme le millet. Allez à votre épicerie et ramassez des paquets de petite taille d’une variété de grains à faible teneur en arsenic, comme l’amarante, la polenta ou le sarrasin. Ensuite, essayez d’incorporer ces grains dans votre alimentation quotidienne comme substituts du riz.

Donnez à votre bébé une grande variété de céréales enrichies de fer. Les jeunes enfant! s sont souvent exposés à l’arsenic contenu dans le riz lorsqu’on ! leur donne des céréales de riz. C’est particulièrement fréquent lorsque les parents utilisent des produits à base de riz pour faire passer leur enfant des liquides aux aliments solides. Remplacez ces collations de riz et ces céréales par des produits céréaliers enrichis d’ingrédients comme l’avoine ou l’orge.

Who read my question CAN WE BE A FRIENDS SOME TIME?

Matt Gerdeman: i don't get it? you want friends by how? yeah, sure.. we can be friends. =)

Soraya Coodey: Sure...We can be good friends

Erica Bottaro: It is my pleasure

Codi Manchel: i"ll be your friend! We can be great friends!

Sunday, June 28, 2020

Why is universal heathcare better than American heathcare?  

Why is universal heathcare better than American heathcare?  

answers 0:Why is universal heathcare better than American heathcare?answers 1:Because people don't die on the streets.answers 2:Neither is the best answer. There is now PROOF that those over the age of 45 (the most expensive group) who meditate 2ce/day have medical bills that are 87% less than others - regardless of age.Unfortunately, your government doesn't want you to know this because illness is profitable and insurance companies support political campaigns. Wellness is not profitable so it cannot support political campaigns.There is also PROOF that we can end war very quickly by meditating in groups but governments don't want you to know this because war is very profitable. The military-industrial complex has bought government. Peace is not profitable so it cannot support political campaigns.American chur! ches don't want you to know how powerful you are and how you can protect yourself from violence and deprivation because violence and scarcity are profitable. If we discover how powerful humans are, humans will stop tithing to churches and they will go out of business along with the corrupt politicians who sell your freedom in the name of freedom itselfBecause this information is being withheld by government that has done it's own study and concurred with the finds, we have become the sheeple who beg to be fleeced and butchered, and who battle fiercely to preserve our right to be victimized. Such a waste. Ignorance is a weapon that intellectual curiosity disarms....answers 3:In the WHO list of healthcare rankings, the US is just below Costa Rica. HA HA HA PATHETIC HUMANS.answers 4:It's cheaper for everyone in the country.In Canada, we don't pay for surgeries, prenatal care/birth, testing, GP visits, child immunization, other emergency care or care that is deemed necessa! ry. The only thing we pay for is prescriptions, dental/eye car! e. But my husband's work insurance covers those for the most part. For a family of 5 we pay a $50 monthly premium; $3 for prescriptions, minimal fees for dental (each member of the family is allotted a certain amount to cover the year in dental, if you go over your yearly amount you do have to pay out of pocket.)I've personally never experienced the wait times conservative americans claim we have....answers 5:Well for starters its healthcare not heathcare. Second of all what does this have to do with religious questions? And third to answer your question i believe Obama might just give you a hint.

South Park or Family Guy?

Russ Kiernan: NO

Mel Crapo: Waffles for me...;P

Jana Sakasegawa: South Park

Clifford Gombos: I prefer legs actually, followed the bottom, followed by breasts

Roni Kurz: Waffles.

Ardelia Liptow: I like Waffles the best.

Clementina Collelo: fg

Barton Sease: south park rules

Tatiana Evanosky: Family guy cuz it's hilarious. Case closed.

Wilbert Shellgren: Boobs

Otto Lingafelt: Pancakes because I don't own a waffle machine.

Toshia Metzker: South Park!

Charlotte Bryar: family guy.

Ronny Nowzari: Well you cant sit on your boobs (unless you're my aunt Flo, lol).......so bottoms have more use in that department.But you wouldn't wanna bottom feed a baby, would you? Therefore breasts are better.Mm! To sit or to suckle?Boobs ;o)...Show more

Connie Dickirson: WOULD THAT BE WONDER WOMAN

Jestine Osumi: Waffles.

Lynn Melbourne: wonder women

Wilmer Skidmore: Boobs for sure!

Danyell ! Rowback: lol, cheaters... choose ONE. =]

Rodolfo Merel: Family Guy for sure

Tamatha Neubaum: Family Guy! I love it.I can't stand South Park.

Clifford Riggleman: I like both, but I like Boobs more.

Giovanna Cramblit: TEN POINTS to the right answer!!

Nicolas Cooley: south park

Coleman Coscia: South Park

Sharee Doak: South Park

Collin Barter: South Park

Anibal Katayama: Neither. Especially to South Park.

Zelma Casebier: family guy south park sucks

Darcie Peraha: i

Jene Kostyla: Waffles.

Benny Stehno: I haven't a clue! :)

Brock Hladik: Both

Hunter Osterberger: Family guyahhh sssssssssssss...

Alexis Reyer: Same =D

Rashad Marecki: Waffles

Bryan Avinger: family guy rocks and south park to me is ok

Doreatha Kjellsen: Family Guy.

Virgil Loatman: Boobs, boobies, little boobs, medium and massive boobs, all of them Boobs! yet... First Boobs, to envision they are ! actual and from the marvelous guy or lady. in any different ca! se, after a lager or 2, the obese-mustache-bearded dude could look kind of threatening to our minds...

Margy Sandquist: South Park

Willis Liburd: gitcher

Caryl Mclaen: Pancakes! Pancakes! PANCAKES!!! (Karate Kicks and Bites your hand)

Carli Watterson: Family Guy all the way! :]

Basil Blasingame: south park always makes me laugh haha u gotta love that show

Patricia Dornbos: My bottom gets more attention.

Lenard Ginyard: family guy

Dedra Furguson: South Park! I love its satire at times.

Cuc Gire: South Park

Shawnna Kusky: Haha! Waffles, with pancakes a close second. Waffles with syrup and a long glass of milk on Saturday morning. Waffles with cream cheese and blackberries for second-breakfast. Waffles with ice cream and a cup of hot chocolate during February. Excuse the sentence fragments, but I do love waffles.

Monty Sieloff: Bottom

Leif Serabia: Family Guy :)

Donnell Mollo:

Zulema Baccam:! Waffles:)

Robin Marchione: love em both :D

Craig Virani: Macadamia Nut pancakes with coconut syrup from the Wailana Coffee House in Honolulu. Yum.

Arlen Decorte: The bottom, 24/7

Brian Freedland: Waffles!

Luke Creitz: Family Guy!

Saturday, June 27, 2020

Comment faire de l

Comment faire de l

Allez et mettez le thon/swordfish en banque à la banque la plus proche.

Allez sur les quais juste au nord du magasin général, après les bananiers.

Allez à un lieu de pêche et sélectionnez Harpoon Fishing spot. Vous commencerez à pêcher le thon et l’espadon.

Apportez encore 30gp (ou continuez à porter votre Ring of Charos (a)), et continuez à pêcher !

Allez au Grand Marché, et vendez votre thon/swordfish/requins.

Obtenez le niveau 35 ou plus, puis allez acheter un harpon et naviguez jusqu’à l’île de Karamja pour 30 gp (ou gratuitement si vous avez un Ring of Charos(a)).

what are some good, credible sources to find information on how smoking bans effect the environment?

Elden Bardach: Thank you for smokingwatch that movie^

Shandi Wedge: They believe in the NYTimes, even though they have a history of misrepresenting the facts of a story, such as the Russian Famine in the 30's, and the trials in Russia they reported never happened, and their refusal to report on Hitler slaughtering Jews, because they didn't want to get into religious affairs

Heidy Fujikake: I had read stuff saying that the risks from 2nd hand smoke were greatly overblown (so to speak) but after doing some research I have found that the risks are real and , more to the point, preventable. So why not?This EPA site provides a good summary of recent studies.Enjoy!

Raye Tredennick: A good eventual yardstick could be Turnover at the local cemetery, Undertakers employment stats with possibly the FTSE index of Lyons?

Samatha Nicar: Try sites like www.sciencedirect.com for journal articles or Google Scholar to search journal articles.Also try searching for ! smoking an its effects on the environment, rather than how the ban effects the environment... as no data will be available for that yet.Scotland has had a ban in place for some time now, and I believe Dublin also has, so maybe look for information with specific reference to those areas.To be honest I doubt you will find very much as I don't think it's of primary concern to most climate researchers etc, but you could find out what emissions and waste (such as the butts) comes from cigarettes and what effect these emissions/waste have on the environment in general and then suggest how cigarettes could potentially add to this or how the ban could reduce this....Show more

Friday, June 26, 2020

What i do in this situation re: the dental treatment?  

What i do in this situation re: the dental treatment?  

answers 0:I worked for a dental office and the doctor told me she was going to throw a pen at me and i said she could not do that so she fired me and told me to leave. I then left and I do have unfinished dental treatment and she is agreeing to complete 1 tooth ( as i am hesitant to go there to avoid confrontation but I do need my tooth to be completed). I also have invisilign which is incomplete. She is telling me to pay balnce in full for the invisilign and to transfer the case to a new doctor. Which means I will be paying her $990.00 for her to do treatment that she didnt do and I have to pay another doctor to complete it. Any advise???...Show moreanswers 1:see a lawyer now, rather than later. If there is a labor issue, get on it. As to the dental work (incomplete) do not pay and bring the! issue to the attention of the dental licensure board as soon as possible.answers 2:I want to suggest you to go to some good dental tourism center around. In Mexico I have one excellent dental treatment support. Their website link is- http://dentalvacationcenter.com/

Is going "green" the true problem?

Charissa Riley: you all have valid points... ill let you guys vote for the best answer

Paul Maymi: No, it's not a money scam. For example, solar power do not release any emissions that go to the atmosphere mix with the couds and drop acid rain on forests and destroy wild life, trees and contaminate drinking water.Going green is working with nature and not against it like coal generated electricity, which release emission in the clouds and causes serious problems and you should think about the emissions that cars release into the atmosphere because it's the same process as any technology releasing toxic gasses into the atmosphere.Coal mining causes severe erosion, resulting in the leaching of toxic chemicals into nearby streams and aquifers, and destroys habitants. * About two-thirds of sulfur dioxide, one-third of carbon dioxide emissions and one quarter of the nitrogen oxides emissions in the U.S. are produced by coal burning. * Coal burning also results in the em! ission of fine particles matter into the atmosphere. Nitrogen oxide and fine airborne particles exacerbate asthma, reduce lung function and cause respiratory diseases and premature death for many thousands of Americans. * Smog formed by nitrogen oxide and reactive organic gases causes crop, forest and property damage. Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides both combine with water in the atmosphere to create acid rain. Acid rain acidifies the soils and water killing off plants, fish, and the animals that depend on them. * Global warming is mainly caused by carbon dioxide emissions and is responsible for at least half of the warming. _________Last, Ten reasons why not to go Nuclear.Source: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/07/nuc...Hope this helps because if we keep the way where going and doin't go green than climate changes are going to get catestrophic, more diseases and we eventually will burn ourselves up. The generations to come will suffer from our destructive ! behavior. AND THAT'S NOT FAIR TO THEM! No ozone=untraviolent! rays hitting this planet. Plant life and trees destroyed? You do the math!...Show more

David Kuper: You've hit upon what's becoming known as "greenwashing"... the whole idea of going green is to REDUCE your impact - that means you buy less and consume less, and of what you must buy and consume, you try to get the product that causes the least harmful side effects.Other respondents have illustrated the harms our environment is facing. And its certainly true Al Gore is the poster boy of the movement, but no saint. But he deserves an enormous amount of credit for awakening people to these problems, if not for his personal efforts to fix it.As "going green" becomes more trendy, can you blame a business (whose job is to sell stuff) for trying to get in on it? Buy t-shirts (made with polyester in China by children) with a recycling logo! Buy Clorox's latest "green cleaning" product line. Buy 46 new reusable shopping bags (made of plastic polymers)! Buy a new high MPG ca! r when your old one was working perfectly well! Buy! Buy! I got a page-a-day calendar for Christmas featuring Green Living tips each day - but the paper wasn't recycled, and the plastic backer wasn't recyclable!Sure, it all makes me a little ill, but I still think that raising awareness is part of the solution, too. I hope that people like you will look at this and come to the conclusion that there IS a problem, but one thing we can't afford to do is buy our way out of it. Going green isn't the problem, but buying green might well be....Show more

Elissa Curlin: Al Gore didn't introduce the Global Warming concept, he just gave it a platform that the average American could understand. Going Green and Global Warming aren't necessarily the same thing. I don't know if the scientists are right or wrong and frankly by the time we know for sure it would likely be too late to do anything about it. Instead I focus on the undesputed truths that being finite resources and poll! ution. I chose to live a more sustainable life because it is better for! my health and the environment. I try to buy my food as close to home as is practicle, this is becoming easier to do as others are also supporting our local agriculture. I chose to be as energy efficient without suffering, I line dry clothes, turn my thermostat up to 80 during the summer down to 65 in winter. I maintain my weather strip, use natural day light, heating and cooling. I'm installing solar PV panels and with the rebates I got I'll get a return on my investment in less than 6 years. I buy recylced items as much as possible. All of these changes and others that I've made have saved my family a lot of money. Some items had an initial investment, but most have a paid for themselves in just a few months....Show more

Robin Tommie: nicely, before everything, i'm no longer a self-proclaimed "actual" Christian. i'm Christian, even with the undeniable fact that. and that i'm with you in this one. I have not have been given any concern with Huckabee being open approx! imately his faith. What I do have a concern with is his use of words which includes "take this usa lower back for Christ" in his campaign speeches. no longer in basic terms does this effectively close out an important share of human beings who take place to *no longer* be Christian, it is likewise not greater useful than the different political pandering to particular communities with the intention to get their votes. That fact does flow slightly extra than in simple terms defining who he's. He isn't the candidate, nonetheless....Show more

Wilbert Shellgren: i think so. idk who to trust.

Sharee Doak: The problem is big industries find a way to profit out of everything and anything. Yes some things are a money scam that they say will improve the environment. However the actual idea of going green is not the true problem. We as the 'little people' cannot change the way the world works as people pay each other out to save their businesses (for example fuel industri! es/ car sales etc) But people can still 'go green' in their own ways. ! Saving water, recycling, reusing, saving power and even finding out how to make your car more fuel efficient. Some people have made their cars basically run off water (hard to believe but true). Its their ideas that should be profited from and endorsed, however they are just paid out like every other idea that threatens big world industries. Going green doesn't have to break the bank. It really doesn't have to cost you anything. In term it could save you money....Show more

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

what is the global warming controversy?

Evelin Turlich: The controversy is there is a large group of people consisting of scientists, environmentalists, and others who have shown solid evidence that human action, specifically carbon emissions, have caused an imbalance in the natural climate cycles of the earth. On the other hand, there is another group who says these claims are false. Not surprisingly this group consists of many ignorant people as well as oil, coal, and gas company representatives and executives.There should be no question that global warming is anthropocentric. The temperature increases of the past hundred and some-odd years have varied directly with increases in human-caused carbon emissions in the atmosphere. We have taken ice-core samples to get readings of carbon content in the atmosphere thousands of years ago, and not surprisingly these have shown that CO2 content in the atmosphere was drastically lower....Show more

Daria Verfaillie: The global warming controversy concerns the ! discussions over the existence of global warming, its causes and effects, and what to do about it.

Vita Moodie: I heard about this ruse in the early 60s. It is designed, among other things, to negate the US Constitution. They came up with something to allegedly affect the whole world so that you would have to be real mean to not want to save the world. First step of a con game is to make your pigeon feel stupid or guilty.This was even admitted by the Club of Rome: Quote by Club of Rome: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention....and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself....believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or….one invented for the purpose."The! re are others who are brazen enough to admit it: Quote by Chri! stine Stewart, former Canadian Environment Minister: “No matter if the science is all phoney, there are collateral environmental benefits.... climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”Quote by Timoth Wirth, U.S./UN functionary, former elected Democrat Senator: “We’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”Quote by Richard Benedik, former U.S./UN bureaucrat: "A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect."The end game is to scare us into having a one world government ruled by tyrannical leaders.Quote from the UN's Own "Agenda 21": "Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both govern! ments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."That is what the UN has in store for our children. But first you have to tear down every political structure and build a new one ground up. These people do not have the best interests for mankind.Quote by Maurice Strong, a billionaire elitist, primary power behind UN throne, and large CO2 producer: “Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?” These 'collapses' are what Obama calls 'bumps in the road'. Where does that road lead to? Quote by Gus Hall, former leader of the Communist Party USA: "Human society cannot basically stop the destruction of the environment under capitalism. Socialism is the only structure that makes it p! ossible."Global warming is a ruse to manipulate people into being scare! d. Once they are scared they are easy to manipulate even further."Fear is the most debilitating of all human emotions. A fearful person will do anything, say anything, accept anything, reject anything, if it makes him feel more secure for his own, his family's or his country's security and safety, whether it actually accomplishes it or not....""It works like a charm. A fearful people are the easiest to govern. Their freedom and liberty can be taken away, and they can be convinced to believe that it was done for their own good - to give them security. They can be convinced to give up their liberty - voluntarily." â€"Gene E. Franchini, retired Chief Justice of the New Mexico Supreme CourtHundreds of billions of dollars has been take out of the world's economy in the cause of Global Warming. Has any body solved the problem? Has anybody proven that there is such a thing as Global Warming or Climate Change? With all that money you would think that the powers that be would have a! t least proven Global Warming as beyond theory. But no, these calamity howlers still ask for more money and give us more scare tactics.Quote by Noel Brown, UN official: "Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of "eco-refugees," threatening political chaos."We could go on but space is limited. Global Warming is a scam!...Show more

Boris Hadsall: It is a made up controversy, invented by the media and politicians, fueled by oil industry money. Serious scientists accept the evidence that global warming is happeninghttp://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/images/wa...And we are causing ithttp://planetsave.com/2010/08/18/humans-cause-glob...

Sherrill Botting: http://chainsmashers.mixxt.com/networks/content/in...http://chainsmashers.mixxt.com/networks/blog/post....http://chainsmashers.mixxt.com/networks/forum/thre! ...

Jules Ashbach: it's a religion that preys on idiots and the s! eriously gullible.

Marcia Cheathan: Its all about sustainability That teaches or brainwashes people that White people areracist all of them even liberals. Some people think the USA owes the rest of the world a living .

Rosalba Lingner: No controversy except among the denialist liars

Violette Vanek: The falsehood of anthropocentric global warming has been designed for one objective, the rebirth of Babylon - a single government whose grip encompasses our entire planet, one language, one nation, one government tyrannical and oppressive. History fades away into peoples minds, we forget and ignore the terrors of the last century. It has only been twenty years since the fall of the USSR, a country hell bent on world domination. It has only been seventy years since the collapse of the Third Reich, another hell bent ideology which sought world domination. Ask yourself this... many countries and governments in history have attempted t! he goal of world government, why wouldn't they do it again?I'm from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, we're giving forty million pounds, that's about sixty million dollars everyday to an unelected commission in Belgium which dictates about 70% of our laws. In the last three years, the financial crisis has been used as an excuse to grab more power from the sovereign states of Europe to create one single country of Europe.Moreover, the idea of Climate Change is being used to destroy my nation, the European Union Commission has placed huge taxes on our industry, crushing it and forcing us to use expensive European "renewable" energy. The President of the EU Commission stated"We must pull our sovereignty together to fight climate change". Yet, when asked not a single fact in agreement with the theory of man made global warming is given....Show more

Lynn Mctier: seen it before. The tobacco companies did it for years denying any link between smoking ! and cancer.climate responds to a number of factors, including greenhous! es gases.. No mystery there if you know some science. The concentration of CO2 has increased since the 1800's, and isotopic analysis traced the CO2 to fossil fuels, coal and oil. In any case, where do you think the millions of tons of coal and oil burnt every years is going? Lucky for us, the ocean absorb a lot, so far....Show more

Lino Cawthorne: The global warming controversy concerns the debate over the existence of global warming, its causes and effects, and what to do about it.

Valentine Willinger: One side has made prediction after prediction, all of which have proven to be wrong.The other side has claimed the whole thing is a scam to grab power.There is no clear evidence either way. You have to decide for yourself.

Dulcie Edis: Its only denied by the adamantly ignorant.

Irving Jordahl: The controversy is there is a large group of people consisting of politicians, environmentalists, and others who have shown no evidence that human action, speci! fically carbon emissions, have caused any imbalance in the natural climate cycles of the earth. On the other hand, there is another group who have shown these claims are false. Not surprisingly this second group consists mostly of scientists.There should be no question that global warming is not anthropocentric. The temperature increases of the past hundred and some-odd years have had no correlation with increases in human-caused carbon emissions in the atmosphere. We have taken ice-core samples to get readings of carbon content in the atmosphere thousands of years ago, and not surprisingly these have shown that CO2 content in the atmosphere was drastically higher and lower....Show more

Pasquale Pollet: In a nutshell, some are afraid that acting to fix global warming (the scientific consensus and preponderance of evidence is global warming is occurring and caused by human activity) will cost too much to fix, so they deny it exist. If they recognize the problem exists! , then that means a solution is needed. The need for a solution scares ! them because it could reduce short-term profits. The best strategy is to confuse and deny the science and evidence to avoid any talk of solutions....Show more

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Cómo obtener un certificado de enmienda para una corporación

Cómo obtener un certificado de enmienda para una corporación

Un Certificado de Enmienda para una Corporación es una forma legal que una corporación completa para indicar cambios a la organización incluyendo un cambio del nombre comercial registrado, un cambio en el tipo de negocio que la compañía lleva a cabo, o un cambio en los artículos de constitución o en las acciones de la compañía. Completar un certificado de enmienda le permite a una compañía hacer los ajustes anteriores basados en las leyes del estado en el que fue incorporada. Un Certificado de Enmienda aprobado reemplaza los artículos de incorporación previamente aceptados.

Obtener el voto de los miembros de la junta directiva u oficiales autorizados. Los estatutos de la sociedad deben contener disposiciones que dirijan el procedimiento para hacer cambios a los artículos de incorporación. Po! r lo general, esto se hará a través de una reunión de la junta directiva. En algunos casos se requerirá el voto de los accionistas. Revise los estatutos y obtenga la autoridad apropiada para un cambio.

Ponga las firmas necesarias. En algunos lugares, los funcionarios específicos de la corporación deben firmar el certificado de enmienda. En otras áreas, puede ser cualquier representante autorizado. Consulte con la oficina del Secretario de Estado de su estado para averiguar cuáles son sus requisitos. No envíe el formulario sin la firma o no podrá ser aceptado.

Llame directamente a la oficina del Secretario de Estado si tiene preguntas. Si no sabe exactamente qué formulario usar, o si necesita presentar alguna enmienda, comuníquese con la oficina del Secretario de Estado. Aunque por lo general no están autorizados a dar asesoramiento jurídico, por lo general son expertos en dirigir a las personas en el uso de los formularios apropiados.

Verifiq! ue con su abogado que necesita presentar una enmienda. Si hay ! alguna duda sobre si se debe presentar una enmienda, consulte con el abogado corporativo de su compañía. Este es un asunto serio, y si usted hace cambios que deben ser presentados en una enmienda, pero no presenta la documentación correcta, usted podría someter a su corporación a una demanda o multas por parte del estado.

Realizar la mayoría de los cambios operativos sin afectar los estatutos. Los artículos de incorporación, que se presentan ante el Secretario de Estado (o alguna otra oficina similar en algunos estados), tienen un propósito limitado y contienen información limitada. Usted sólo necesita una enmienda de los artículos de incorporación si está haciendo un cambio a alguna de la siguiente información:

Consulte con la oficina de su Secretario de Estado. La mayoría de los estados tienen un formulario aprobado para que usted lo use para enmendar sus artículos de incorporación. Visite el sitio web de la Secretaría de Estado y averigüe ! si puede descargar el formulario e imprimirlo, o si tienen un formulario en línea que usted puede completar y enviar electrónicamente.

Mantener un registro de la enmienda. El original del certificado de enmienda, junto con la prueba sellada de la presentación, debe mantenerse en los registros corporativos junto con los artículos originales de constitución. La secretaria de la corporación usualmente guarda estos registros en un lugar seguro para cualquier posible necesidad que pueda surgir en el futuro.

Archivar electrónicamente, si es posible. En algunos estados, se le permite enmendar los artículos de incorporación haciendo cambios en línea y enviando el formulario electrónicamente. Si puede hacer esto, sus cambios serán aceptados antes y, debido a la tecnología, tiene menos posibilidades de dejar el formulario incompleto.

Incluya cualquier papeleo adicional que su estado pueda requerir. En algunos casos, el Secretario de Estado puede exigirl! e que presente documentación adicional junto con la enmienda a los art! ículos. Si no lo incluye todo, es probable que su envío le sea devuelto. Dependiendo de los requisitos de su estado, este papeleo adicional puede incluir algunos o todos los siguientes elementos:

Archivar por correo, si es necesario. Si usted declara que no permite la presentación electrónica, entonces obtenga una copia del formulario ya sea imprimiéndolo a través de su computadora o obteniendo una copia impresa de la oficina del Secretario de Estado. Complete el formulario y envíelo por correo a la dirección correcta.

Recibir una copia sellada y archivada de la enmienda. Si presenta la solicitud por correo, debe incluir una copia adicional de la enmienda y pedir que se selle como prueba de la presentación y se le devuelva. Si presenta la solicitud en línea, debería poder imprimir alguna forma de prueba de la presentación.

Averigüe si su estado requiere algún lenguaje en particular o declaraciones en la enmienda. Algunos estados, por ejemplo,! requieren que la enmienda declare que el consejo de administración y los accionistas han votado a favor de la enmienda. Otros estados pueden requerir una declaración del voto de los funcionarios. Consulte con el secretario de estado o la división corporativa de su estado para averiguar si tiene requisitos similares.

Complete las secciones necesarias del formulario de enmienda. Los cambios que usted puede hacer por medio de una enmienda son limitados, por lo que completar el formulario suele ser bastante sencillo. En algunos estados, el formulario debe completarse en línea o a máquina, mientras que en otros se acepta incluso un formulario escrito a mano. Simplemente lea las instrucciones en la parte superior del formulario.

Incluya la tasa de presentación correspondiente. La presentación de una enmienda a los artículos de constitución normalmente requiere una tasa de presentación. Las tarifas varían de estado a estado, pero generalmente son de entre $! 50 y $100.

opinions on global warming?

Peter Lapoint: Well they have earned their reputation for altering data streams to fit their preconceived view of what they should be from their models. So once again they have been caught with their fingers in the cookie jar by investigative outsiders.http://landshape.org/enm/greenhouse-thermodynamics...

Denna Prudente: Global warming is a scam. This is all about who gets to profit most from a natural climate cycle, and there are global forces who foresee huge profit potential resulting from their scam.

Olen Penhallurick: theres no inbetween do u mean not man cased? anyway its bull

Lawanna Livsey: Do scientists agree about global warming?Scientists who study the climate are still arguing about how fast the earth is warming and how much it will warm, but they do agree that the earth is warming and that it will keep warming if we don’t do anything about it. I hope this will help you do something about it What is causing global warming?Scientists agree ! that the burning of fossil fuels like oil and coal cause greenhouse gases to escape into the air and that these gases are causing most of the warming. Another cause is deforestation (cutting down trees). Trees soak up carbon dioxide, one of the greenhouse gases, from the air.What is the difference between "global warming" and "climate change?""Global warming" refers to the increase of the Earth's average surface temperature, due to a build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. "Climate change" is a broader term that refers to long-term changes in climate, including average temperature and precipitation.What will happen if global warming continues?There are already some changes happening because of global warming. Sea level is rising and some animals are already moving to new homes. It’s already too late to stop global warming completely.If the warming gets worse, as scientists expect, there may be some kinds of plants and animals that become extinct (disappear complet! ely) because they can’t move to new homes. There may be more! storms and floods. Sea level may rise so much that people have to move away from the coasts. Some areas may become too dry for farming.What is being done about global warming?Global warming is a very difficult problem to fix. People are having a hard time agreeing on what to do about it. For example, everyone agrees that wasting energy is a bad thing to do. But some people think that the federal government should make laws about it, while other people think it should be up to each person or business to decide what to do.Many states and businesses in the United States are not waiting until the federal government decides what to do. They have already started working on the problem.What can I do about global warming?You don’t have to wait until you are grown to do something about global warming. Scientists agree that the burning of fossil fuels is causing global warming. Since these fuels are burned for energy, and everyone uses energy, everyone can help stop global warming! just by using less energy.Think about the things you do each day that use energy. The lights in your house use electricity. The TV and computer use electricity. The washing machine, dishwasher and dryer all use gas or electricity. Every time you ride in your car, it uses gasoline.There are some very simple things that everyone can do to help stop global warming:· Turn off the lights when you leave a room. Use fluorescent bulbs in your room.· Turn off your computer or the TV when you’re not using it. Unplug chargers when not in use.· Wait until you have a lot of clothes to wash before using the washing machine. Don’t use the machine for one item just because it’s your favorite shirt.· Take shorter showers. Heating water uses energy.· Close the blinds on a hot day if the sun is shining in. Dress lightly instead of turning up the air conditioning. Or use a fan.· Dress warmly when it’s cold, instead of turning up the heat.· Offer to help your parents keep the a! ir filters on your AC and furnace clean.· Walk short distances instead! of asking for a ride in a car.· Plant a tree....Show more

Stormy Beliard: Based on this video would he have accepted the AGW "consensus?" Interesting question asked by audience member relating to pollution. Seems like this has been going on for a lot longer than most people may realize.

Jose Bouliouris: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yRh5NNiFG0

Catheryn Small: I'm already pretty confident that they're just lying. I keep looking for evidence to the contrary, but I haven't seen it yet.

Willie Tun: Yes it's real, but the earth has been warming and cooling for thousands of years. Long before the industrial age. People who blame mankind are either ignorant or have an agenda. C02 is currently at a globally averaged concentration of approximately 385 parts per million by volume in the Earth's atmosphere, and mankind produces only five percent of the 335. This means that human-created C02 accounts for only 16.75 parts per million. That's 16.75 tons of C! 02 out of every 1,000,000 tons of other atmosphere. Leading scientists agree that the earth's temperature has risen a mere 1/2 a degree in over 100 years....Show more

Horace Escue: IT IS REAL, and those who are kidding themselves, wake up! Especially all those policticians and world leaders who refuse to do anything to fight global warming and make a change in the world.If you read Al Gore's books and watch his movies and documentoriess etc, you'll see just how much global warming is affecting us, and just how fast. Everywhere around us, things are slowly becoming extinct, dying and deteriorating because of global warming. we need to act fast!This is the earth we're talking about. the place we live. Where are we, our children, our future generations going to live if there is no world for them because people like Bush are refusing to do anything to fight is?!...Show more

Brittanie Zakutney: no follow george bush's example and don't acknowledge it.

Roxane Le! athers: NoGlobal warming is a cult.

Alma Twomey: I am in favour o! f global warming cause it is too cold here in Bobcaygeon, and the rising sea levels will bring closer access to tropical beaches. Mother Nature will do as she pleases and us dumb humans are so egotistical in thinking that we can change her plan for better, or worse. The dinosaurs probably thought they were in control too. Millions of years of heating and cooling periods have occurred on this planet so any particular " carbon footprint " is simply a marketing tool to be used by companies and governments....Show more

Angelyn Ducas: I could care less.

Francis Stickle: OK, you have probably heard a lot of people say that Global Warming is just a natural cycle, and that there's nothing we can do to stop it from occurring. While there is some truth to that (Global Warming is a natural cycle, and it's going to occur no matter what) there's something else out there that's messing up this natural cycle, and is making it like nothing the world has ever seen before. Tha! t new factor is human activities. Human activities directly affect the greenhouse effect (which directly affects Global Warming), you see greenhouse gases a natural in the atmosphere to keep us from freezing over, but since the beginning of the industrial age, we (humans) have added excess greenhouse gases into the atmosphere that aren't suppose to be there (and the more we add the harder it is for the earth to remove them). These excess gases trap more heat and release less causing the whole earth to heat up (a.k.a. Global Warming) this is NOT good because the slightest change in the earth's climate systems can affect the entire thing. Causing new climate patterns to emerge that we may not be able to adapt to (and about 1/3 to 2/3 of the worlds species as well).But there is still hope. We currently have all of the technology, money, man power, and resources we need to EFFECTIVLEY slow Global Warming back down to its modest warming over thousands of years. To get more infor! mation, evaluate your daily impact, and to find out how you can start r! educing your daily impact (cheaply) go to climatecrisis.org and/or think.mtv.com and/or nasa.gov and/ or http://liveearth.msn.com/green/mythsAnd if this still isn't working for you then I have a question for you. In about 30 years (if humans haven’t decide to change our ways, go green, and slow down the effects of Global Warming to its natural rate) and the effects of Global Warming have set in so far that there's nothing we can do or any one after us can do to reverse what WE have done, and my children/grandchildren and you children/grandchildren have to live with the horrible effects What are you going to say? What are you going to say when they ask you, "What were you thinking? Why didn't you do anything?" WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO SAY?...Show more

Ruby Martis: I very much doubt that this year is going to make it into the top ten, but if scientists report that it is, and I have no evidence to the contrary (anecdotal evidence is not scientific evidence), I will have n! o reasonable choice but to accept it. I realize the concept of withholding judgement until the evidence is in may seem a foreign concept to you, but I assure you it's a perfectly rational way of going about things.And since we're apparently taking the immediate weather conditions in our own backyards as evidence of long term global trends, I thought I might point out that here where I live the temperatures were in the lower 80's this afternoon. I went to dinner in shorts and a t-shirt. Global warming must be happening a lot faster than any of us realized.

Bibi Tyron: man made global warming is a big hoax. Global warming is natural though because the earth is going through a cycle. Other planets in our solar system are warming to and the sun is getting hotter.

Kaley Lappas: No, global warming is not terrible, our civilization would not be where it is today if we were in the middle of an ice age, andYes, if history repeats itself warming or cooling will eventual! ly kill off a majority of the species on the planet.

Timmy Bustar! d: gcn the people who are lying to me are the ones who tell me, as I wear a parka in November and early December for the first time since I was a kid, that it's still getting warmer.

Shelley Stevens: PollDo you think Global Warming is terrible? Will it destroy humans? Please vote Yes/No this is for my debate thanks.

Glynda Darrin: It didn't stop them from declaring October was the warmest October on record. They did this while the Arctic ice froze at the fastest rate ever recorded.Then they came up with a peer reviewed, scientific sounding report to explain how ice can grow so fast when temperatures are above freezing.So I have no doubt that Dr. Hansen is going to proclaim 2008 the warmest year ever before this month is over....Show more

Isreal Kochheiser: duh.......it's true. have you seen the polar ice caps? do u know that thaat's why all the polar bears are dying? that's why some places are having drouts while other places have floods. that's the reaso! n for hurricane katrina and that's why greenland has shrunk by millions of square miles in the last few years.

Nelly Kikuchi: Well, it does make me wonder about the ruins of vinyeards in Roman time England, and whether it was really colder then....

Libby Berkovitch: Sorry I cannot give my opinion, without you telling me why do you want to know. It makes a difference on how one should answer the question.

Solomon Belback: He would have had enough intelligence to realize AGW is trueNo short-haired, yellow-bellied, son of Tricky DickyIs gonna mother hubbard soft soap meI'm sick and tired of hearing thingsFrom uptight, short-sighted, narrow-minded hypocritesI've had enough of watching scenesOf schizophrenic, ego-centric, paranoiac, prima-donnasHe had you denialists pegged all those years ago...Show more

Ardell Luy: A careful look at global warming, as a topic, shows that there is a great deal of disagreement about the facts and substance of climate chang! e. Those who blame man for climate change often disagree about what fac! ts lead them to that conclusion. Those who hold man totally innocent of it often ignore established facts. Experience and research leads us to believe that warming is, in fact, occurring; however, there is little to no objective evidence that man is the cause, nor that the effects will be catastrophic. The idea of earth “wearing out” is an apt analogy. This entire world has been continually decaying since the fall.Global warming “facts” are notoriously hard to come by. One of the few facts universally agreed upon is that the current average temperature of Earth is indeed rising at this time. According to most estimates, this increase in temperature amounts to about 0.4-0.8 °C (0.72-1.44 °F) over the last 100 years. Data regarding times before that is not only highly theoretical but very difficult to obtain with any accuracy. The very methods used to obtain historical temperature records are controversial, even among the most ardent supporters of the theory of huma! n-caused climate change. The facts leading one to believe that humans are not responsible for the current change in temperature are as follows:• Global temperature changes from past millennia, according to available data, were often severe and rapid, long before man supposedly had any impact at all. That is, the current climate change is not as unusual as some alarmists would like to believe.• Recent recorded history mentions times of noticeable global warming and cooling, long before man had any ability to produce industrial emissions.• Water vapor, not CO2, is the most influential greenhouse gas. It is difficult to determine what effect, if any, mankind has on worldwide water vapor levels.• Given the small percentage of human-produced CO2, as compared to other greenhouse gases, human impact on global temperature may be as little as 1%.• Global temperatures are known to be influenced by other, non-human-controlled factors, such as sunspot activity, orbital moveme! nt, volcanic activity, solar system effects, and so forth. CO2 emission! is not the only plausible explanation for global warming.• Ice Age temperature studies, although rough, frequently show temperatures changing before CO2 levels, not after. This calls into question the relationship between warming and carbon dioxide; in some cases, the data could easily be interpreted to indicate that warming caused an increase in carbon dioxide, rather than the reverse!• Computer simulations used to “predict” or “demonstrate” global warming require the assumption of human causation, and even then are not typically repeatable or reliable. Current computer weather simulations are neither predictive nor repeatable.• Most of the global temperature increase of the last 100 years occurred before most of the man-made CO2 was produced.• In the 1970s, global temperatures had actually been dropping since 1945, and a “global cooling” concern became prominent, despite what is now dismissed as a lack of scientific support.• The “consensus” cla! imed by most global warming theorists is not scientific proof; rather, it is a statement of majority opinion. Scientific majorities have been wrongly influenced by politics and other factors in the past. Such agreement is not to be taken lightly, but it is not the same thing as hard proof.• This “consensus,” as with many other scientific theories, can be partially explained by growing hostility to those with differing viewpoints, making it less likely that a person without preconceived notions would take on the subject for research. The financial and political ramifications of the global warming debate are too serious to be ignored, though they should not be central to any discussion.• The data being used to support anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming is typically based on small data sets, single samples, or measurements taken in completely different regions. This creates an uncertainty in the results that rarely gets the attention that alarmist conclusions do! .While the above list is not exhaustive, it does include several of the! major points that raise doubts about mankind’s actual effect on global temperatures. While no one can deny that warming is occurring, “overwhelming evidence” of any objective type does not exist to support the idea that global warming is significantly influenced by human actions. There is plenty of vague, short-sighted, and misunderstood data that can be seen as proving “anthropogenic” global-warming theory. All too often, data used to blame humans for global warming is far less reliable than data used for other areas of study. It is a valid point of contention that the data used in these studies is frequently flawed, easily misinterpreted, and subject to preconception.In regards to issues such as this, skepticism is not the same as disbelief. There are fragments of evidence to support both sides, and logical reasons to choose one interpretation over another. The question of anthropogenic global warming should not divide Christian believers from each other (Luke ! 11:17). Environmental issues are important, but they are not the most important questions facing mankind. Christians ought to treat our world with respect and good stewardship, but we should not allow politically driven hysteria to dominate our view of the environment. Our relationship with God is not dependent on our belief in human-caused global warming.For further research on global warming, we recommend the following articles:http://www.icr.org/article/3233/http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/ http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/ice_age...http://www.xtronics.com/reference/globalwarming.ht...http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/14...http://www.whrc.org/carbon/images/GlobalCarbonCycl...http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/fig3-1.ht...Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/global-warming.html#ix......Show more

Sibyl Siwik: It's impossible for a person to tell what the climate is doing just by feeling it. We can only make informed judgments ba! sed on the information available

Lawanna Livsey: The earth is co! ntinually going through cycles of climate change. Can you imagine the panic that would have happened if modern man had existed 20,000 years ago and witnessed the melting of the great glaciers that happened at the end of the last ice age. Global warming is a fact but it is possible that what is happening now is a natural continuation of the climate changes that ended the last ice age. Man wasn't around in large enough numbers to have caused the melting of the great glaciers that covered much of the northern hemisphere. Yet it happened and it happened many times before man even walked this planet. Our use of fossil fuels may be accelerating the changes in climate but the process began before mankind had an influence and it will continue regardless of our efforts. Mankind must prepare for the future or like all species on this planet adapt or become extinct....Show more

Clemente Schoeck: You already have, even after seeing the data. Have you ever wondered why it is that! the people you think aren't lying to you are the ones telling you what you want to hear?edit: You're getting older. Aging sucks. One of the things that happens when you age is you notice the cold more (mainly since you aren't as active). You're not wearing a parka because it is colder *on average.* You're wearing a parka because you notice the coldest days more now. If you were really being objective about this, you would dig out weather records going back to when you were 5 and plot the average winter temperatures. If you had lived at roughly the same latitude and longitude, you would undoubtedly notice it was colder when you were 5 than now. But even seeing that data, assembled and plotted by yourself, you would reject it because you *cannot* accept that the world is warming up. See, you're not starting from an objective reference frame, so no amount of evidence will ever be enough for you. Happily for you, nothing of any consequence will ever be done about cli! mate change, and we'll all just have to adapt as best we can. Que sera! sera.

Myron Leftwich: I think your should read more peer-reviewed scientific journals and fewer conspiracy theory blogs before you conclude that people who are significantly smarter than you are in fact, lying. I could hand you hard evidence that global warming is real, that it is a man-made occurrence, and that it is only getting worse, but I sense the problem here with you is something different altogether. You think there is a conspiracy, and therefore, any contradictory evidence is just a part of that conspiracy. Now, I need to ask you this: Why do you think there is a conspiracy? Is it really possible that tens of thousands of scientists are engaging in mass deception? For what point or purpose? And furthermore, how would this mass conspiracy have been conducted? Do you realize that it's taken more than a century to reach the current scientific consensus regarding climate change? Who could orchestrate a plot this elaborate for this long in what is really and tru! ly a rather indirect way to get to power? And if you say "The Illuminati" I'm going to smack you through the internet. If you think this is fueled by the scientific community's desire to get more research money, and that the motive here is purely greed, then you clearly don't know any scientists. It's hardly a cushy job being a researcher in any scientific field. I know people who have stayed up entire nights identifying organisms on a boat in god-knows-where, fleshing out the details on obscure species that most people have never even heard of or that fewer even care about. Scientists are among some of the most selfless people on earth. They dedicate their lives to expanding mankind's collective knowledge about the world around us. To see you, some third-rate internet guttersnipe, try to belittle the scientific community just because you walked outside today and had to wear a jacket because it was a little chilly, is disgusting.

Edmund Rappley: http://green.chron.co! m/green/2008/12/05/250810889-...This year is set to be the coolest sinc! e 2000, according to a preliminary estimate of global average temperature that is due to be released next week by the Met Officehttp://www.theage.com.au/national/coldest-winter-i...Coldest winter in 10 years in Australia.I am guessing that they will start to focus on other bogus issues such as ocean acidification. What else can they do. They can average the latest 20 years I suppose.

Elsie Resner: They is evidence to support both sides of the global warming argument. The difficult part is that people usually believe the most popular opinion i.e., Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth. The problem with that is that many important facts are left out and ignored altogether. For instance, Al Gore's documentary failed to even mention the effect of volcanic activity and the environment. Volcanic eruptions contribute more to global warming than any other earthly variable, including us. The other problem with the global warming argument is how people like Al Gore use emotional! ploys (such as dieing animals and shrinking ecosystems)to get people to pay attention. This is not fair to anyone. Yes, it may well be true that animals die and their habitats shrink but, is this contributed by global warming alone? What about urban sprawl, cattle farming in the rainforests, and an ever increasing human population? Global warming is a difficult issue to really get to the bottom of because of all of the garbage like this that surrounds it. I hope this helps a little. Good luck....Show more

Benny Stehno: Destroy humans completely? No. Kill most of us off? Yes. Destroy the Earth? No.

Terrell Lawman: Basically Goebbels was right in regards to the proper usage of the unfree press. What first needs to be done is to free the press from the hands of the oppressor.I think the so obviously wrong Mann graph was to me the key that the whole thing was a setup for a political power garb. They need to do some real studying because the AGW concept comes fr! om a very poor understanding of how the world and its climate functions! . Even during the little ice age there were 3 warm spikes timed 200 years apart at 1400, 1600 and 1800AD. Wait just a minute 200 years apart, then the 2000 warming was right on schedule as part of the normal cycle, not out of sequence or unusual at all and it is also normal to dip into cooling after the spike. So we had cool minimums at 1300, 1500, 1700 and 1850 so we probably will soon be heading into a cool period. So here are some educational materials on climate and geology from major instructors showing how these misunderstandings came to be.http://www.weatherquestions.com/Roy-Spencer-on-glo...http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/ http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Articles1.htmlhttp://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/T...

Danyell Rowback: Jen and Web why? Why serve as useful idiots? This is Orwellian. They re-wrote the climate history - why do you think they wouldn't re-write the climate present?

Kenneth Blacker: I spend a lot of time outdoors and! this year has been noticeably cool.

Arlen Lopiccalo: No

Monty Sieloff: Fascinating to see these people who come here to post that they don't care about it! Their indifference has such passion!

Billie Bratchett: i believe it real but it started happening g way before people think.. i watched a show about the titanic and they think that is how the ice bergs broke away. so global warming has started from the 1800's

Isreal Kochheiser: I also believe global warming could have started in the 1800's because people did not know of the toxins going out to the air to deplete the ozone layer back then.

Jesusita Dykhoff: I believe in climate change. I believe that global warming and global cooling belong to the category of climate change. I believe that climate change is caused mainly by human intervention and activity. It is not natural. And most every scientist that is not getting grants from politicians or companies, and are not being blackmailed to s! peak against it, approve it. The Union of Concerned Scientists released! a memo pleading for control by 2020. It was one page long. The list of scholars, professors, scientists, educators, politicians, colleges, and universities in the US alone numbered over 2500. I also believe that nearly all the atmospheric and ecological actions happening worldwide (Pine Beetle return, oceanic acidification, Siberian methane release/permafrost thaw, Greenland's retreat, increased snow in the US south, increasing heat waves in Europe, are all linked to climate change. They can be defined by it, as they are all abnormal weather occurrences. I also believe, that because f the skeptics out there who strongly disagree against global warming (which I believe is false too) that are not scientists, or have never taken a course in Environmental Science, don't have a right to speak for themselves. and those who don't believe in it, but don't speak up, should educate themselves....Show more

Monday, June 22, 2020

Maximum height using conservation of energy?

Lizzette Wendroth: I believe I actually have to agree with ashhh on this one :(

Jeannine Vassie: Vb=sqrt(v^2+2gh)

Russel Gajate: h=v^2/2g

Nona Lentini: what the frick?

Darnell Cutliff: Hmax=((V^2)/(2g))

Corrinne Ruozzo: CONSERVATION OF ENERGY:kinetic energy gained=potential energy lostand vice-versaSo if you start with no PE and end with no KE, that becomesInitial KE = 1/2 mv^2=final PE = mghSolve for final max height starting from a speed v:h = v^2 / 2gOr going the other way, solve for speed after a fall from height h:v = sqrt (2gh)...Show more

Mauro Cowee: A greater finished answer usinfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05b enerfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05by is PE(i) + KE(i) + W(nc) = PE(f) + KE(f) 0 + ½ m fc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05b + 0 = m v²/2g h + ½ m (v²/2g cos ?)v²/2g the place v²/2g cos ? is the horizontal element of the ball's fc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05belocity, which does no longer! chanfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05be. h = [fc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05b] (a million - cosfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05b?) observe that if ? = ninety°, you fc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bet h = fc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05bfc3367785ba1c1ae27ef4bdd2cb1d05b as predicted...Show more

Sunday, June 21, 2020

If you are having protected sex with someone, is it necessary to get an STD test too?  

If you are having protected sex with someone, is it necessary to get an STD test too?  

answers 0:I am seeing this guy, but I have a feeling it's just a summer fling. However, I really like him, we're both consenting adults, and he's very attractive. He told me he had an STD test this month which came out clean (and he seems like an honest guy), and I am very paranoid about STDs. If we had sex, we would (of course) use a condom, but few people use condoms for oral sex anymore. When I asked him if he would get another test, he said he would, but that it was kind of weird to get an STD test when we'd be having protected sex anyway, especially if I'm not his girlfriend. I guess I agreed, but I really do want to have sex with him. What should I do?...Show moreanswers 1:Well...it depends. Even if your partner has a condom on, it is still possible to contract an STD. Condoms don't cover everything and if he has he! rpes, that can be spread by skin to skin contact. Also, if the condom breaks, you could also be infected. Just stay safe and ask him to get another. Its not a big deal, and it doesn't take much time. If you risk something like this, you may end up regretting it for the rest of your life. Good luck! Hope this helps!answers 2:I'm a female by the way hahaanswers 3:It's the recommended safe sex practice to be tested (BOTH of you) as well as using a condom. The safer the better. If you want to use protection during oral sex, it's pretty easy to make a dental dam out of a folded-over piece of cellophane. Much more comfortable than a condom.That said, there is no reason to be hyper-paranoid. Why are you more paranoid about getting an STD than getting, say, the flu? They're just illnesses, the vast majority of which are curable with antibiotics. Of those that are not: everyone already has herpes, including you, whether or not they've had sex. It's basically part of the human genome! now. You can vaccinate against about half of the forms of HPV! . And if you insist on your partners being tested for AIDS, then keeping in mind there is a 3-6 month latency period, there is no reason to worry about that.By the way, for Joe up there, it is absolutely evil to tell people that condoms do not help prevent the spread of herpes and AIDS, which they DEFINITELY do. They are not absolutely, positively, 100% effective at it, but that is what testing is for. telling people that condoms do not help prevent the spread of AIDS will cause them to have sex without them, thus ENSURING the spread of AIDS, which is why people like Joe are evil, despicable scum, who would rather spread their political/religious ideology than save people's lives....answers 4:YOU DO KNOW that condoms do NOT protect against herpes or aids don't you?Keep playing with fire and you are going to get burned hon, consenting adults or not.answers 5:good decision. convinced it is nevertheless necessary to get examined and strong for you at playing it secure. Mono is! n't oftentimes a STD and alot of STDs have very nearly no indications for quite a at the same time as.

Why are natural gas vehicles better?Thank You!?

Kassie Kay: Cheaper to run, and environmentally friendly, but not too fun to drive though.

Ollie Hamiel: natural gas can burn at almost 98 percent,way cleaner

Marita Stadick: Compressed Natural Gas is the most common alternative fuel as many cities and governments have converted used it to power their diesel buses and trucks. AdvantagesVery easy on the engine, giving longer service life and lower maintenance costs.Reduces the demand for finite petroleum supplyReduces exhaust emission pollutionImproves fuel consumption and engine efficiency. When CNG and air in the right proportions are brought together, they mix thoroughly and rapidly, thereby improving the combustion efficiency, while the engine stays clean internallyDry gaseous fuel does not dilute the lubricating oil, thus saving on oil filters and oil chargers DisadvantagesDriving complaints due to loss of power with CNG. Dynamometer tests indicate that CNG-fuelled vehicles have 10-15% lower power output! than petrol engines.Increased exhaust-valve wear in CNG-operated vehicles are anticipated due to the drying effect of the gaseous fuelLimited service availabilityHigh cost of conversionThe additional weight of CNG cylinders does pose a problemCountries who have more stringent regulations on exhaust gases would require retarding the timing even more and this would decrease power output and fuel efficaintcy.Inability to make an impression on the common man...Show more

Lou Rought: Much less CO2 produced, reduces global warming.

Elinore Schlinker: Cleaner burning engine and the engine lasts much much longer. That point alone is good for the enviroment because not replacing engines.

Susan Rambo: CNG has been around for an extremely long term. The infrastructure is genuinely not geared up via fact it is to costly. you could deploy a unmarried fill station that takes quite a few hours to fill a automobile economically, yet a station to fill 6 automobiles in unde! r ten minutes, its extensive, a minimum of $500,000. next, who! 's keen to fill up each ninety to 270 miles? So, the organic gas automobile is a solid commuter the place you have a $10,000 filling station which you will stay hooked to all night to fill up your automobile. better yet, you maintain the gas gadget and run on the NG as you could. Be arranged for a $2000 modification. next, the fee is low suited now in some factors, as low as $a million.00 consistent with GGE. It averages approximately $2.50 and is as extreme as $4.00. Its all dependant on if the station is sitting around the corner to a gas container and if the state (like Utah) is giving a extensive momentary rebate. finally, shall we kick in furnish and demand. organic gas has risen in fee swifter than crude oil. In 1998 it grow to be $2. today it is $10 and it has not dropped lower back like crude did final month. Crude oil went from $28 to $one hundred forty, lower back to $a hundred and ten. If all of us switched to organic gas, the call for will deliver it to the moon! . and then WHAT, your place heating bill will triple, does that sound clever, its ethanol area II, affordable gas extreme fee nutrition........Show more

Hwa Waterford: All well and good, but the 3-10 3000psi cylinders under the vehicle might not seem good in a crash.I'll take biodeisel instead. It actually CLEANS the air.

Saturday, June 20, 2020

Comment se débarrasser des gens qui vous détestent

Comment se débarrasser des gens qui vous détestent

p>Nous aimons tous être entourés de gens positifs qui nous aiment et nous font nous sentir bien. Cependant, nous nous entourons parfois de gens qui ne semblent pas nous aimer, peu importe les efforts que nous faisons. Interagir avec des gens qui ne vous aiment pas peut être toxique et apporter beaucoup de négativité dans votre vie. Couper ces gens de votre vie peut être difficile, mais faites des merveilles pour vous rendre plus heureux.

Observez leurs autres relations. Les personnes qui sont négatives et toxiques ont tendance à avoir des relations unilatérales. Parfois, il peut être difficile d’être un observateur de votre propre relation. Observez comment ils interagissent avec leurs autres amis, en particulier s’ils parlent négativement d’autres personnes. Ceux qui ressente! nt le besoin de faire tomber les autres peuvent faire la même chose pour vous.

Lève-toi pour toi-même. Bien qu’il puisse être difficile d’éliminer un membre négatif de la famille, vous ne devriez pas laisser leur comportement se dérouler sans commentaire. Cela les empêchera non seulement de changer, mais plus important encore, cela permettra à la négativité de rester dans votre vie.

Soyez ouvert et communiquez. Alors que les amitiés vont et viennent, les choses deviennent plus compliquées lorsqu’il s’agit d’un membre de la famille. S’il s’agit d’un membre de la famille, vous voudrez essayer de parler de votre relation et de ce qui vous dérange. Cela leur fera prendre conscience que ce qu’ils font vous dérange.

Éloignez-vous de la situation. Si vous avez décidé que la relation ne peut être sauvée, vous devrez trouver des moyens de vous en éloigner.

Réalisez que vous avez besoin d’un changement. Quand vous réa! lisez que quelqu’un ne vous aime pas et que vous seriez mieu! x sans sa négativité, faites un changement pour votre propre bien. Cette étape importante signifie que vous êtes prêt à rechercher un changement positif dans votre vie et à vous entourer de personnes ayant des objectifs similaires.

Préparez-vous à les couper. Personne ne veut perdre une relation avec un membre de la famille, mais s’il ne peut pas tenir compte de vos avertissements selon lesquels il vous fait du mal, vous devez d’abord vous inquiéter pour vous-même. Si le membre de votre famille n’a donné aucune indication qu’il changera, vous ne devriez pas vous laisser embourber par lui jusqu’à ce qu’il puisse régler ses propres problèmes.

Apprenez à dire non. Si vous essayez de mettre fin à une relation négative, rappelez-vous que les amitiés sont des relations mutuellement consensuelles. En d’autres termes, si vous ne vous trouvez pas dans une amitié qui vous aide, n’ayez pas peur de mettre le pied à l’étrier. Lorsque t! ous les autres moyens ont échoué et que votre ami négatif persiste, dites-lui simplement non et évitez les interactions sociales.

Allez chercher de l’aide. Cela dépend de l’identité du membre de la famille et de la signification de sa relation pour vous. S’il s’agit d’un parent, d’un frère, d’une sÅ"ur ou même d’un conjoint, vous pouvez opter pour l’opinion d’un tiers et suivre une thérapie.

Établir des limites. Parler peut être utile, mais là où cela échoue, vous devez agir d’une manière qui est la meilleure pour votre propre bien-être. Il peut s’agir d’éviter leurs conversations, d’éviter d’être au même endroit qu’eux ou même tout simplement de tracer une ligne pour les éviter à tout prix.

Concentrez-vous sur ce qu’ils vous font ressentir. Il peut être difficile de reconnaître une personne qui est toxique et qui n’est pas dans votre intérêt, surtout si vous la connaissez depuis longtemps. Un ! signe certain d’une personne toxique et négative est l’écoute de ! votre intestin et de ce qu’il vous fait ressentir.

Limitez vos interactions. Si vous avez un membre de votre famille qui est toxique, il serait peut-être préférable que vous n’interagissiez avec eux que pendant les réunions obligatoires comme les vacances et les célébrations.

Trouvez un autre groupe d’amis. Cela peut être difficile, mais si vous rencontrez constamment quelqu’un qui ne vous aime pas par l’intermédiaire d’un groupe d’amis communs, vous voudrez peut-être trouver un nouveau groupe pour traîner avec lui ou lui dire votre problème.

Entourez-vous de positivité. Une façon d’éliminer cette mauvaise herbe, c’est de l’entourer de bonnes choses. Si vous mettez les gens autour de vous, ils sont positifs et rendent votre situation positive.

Do most women need a constant dose of entertainment?

Magda Vandergriend: I don't really agree it really depends on the woman. I for one like a nice man and been dating him for over two years. It is not at all boring nor do I need a constant dose of entertainment. I feel like girls feel the need to vent more to a loved one or be entertained by making them laugh but there other ways for a girl to entertain her self ex hanging with friends, watching a movie, or exercising..

Jeff Frizzell: Yeah but we play video games, not have anal intercourse with bad boys/girls. :'o

Manie Labat: I think its men who always need entertainment or something to seize their interest. Its women who need a constant dose of attention and reassurance.

Shawnna Kusky: It's just how life is, you or me cannot change this. I just refuse to date girls who don't have a sense of sincerity towards themselves.

Magda Vandergriend: Most people need a constant does of entertainment.See America.

Ofelia Kieck: Being that way is just im! mature and unstable. When you find the right guy you better appreciate him or you will miss out hard.

Friday, June 19, 2020

Why is it acceptable to show a mans nipple in public and on television, but not a womans?

Ruthe Real: It stems from Victorian values (around the time of Queen Victoria's reign in Britain in the late 1800's) where it was a social taboo for a 'proper' lady to show any part of her body, other than her hands and face. Even ankles were frowned upon, and social norms became so bizarre that even table legs were covered with long table cloths so that the gentlemen in the room would not be aroused.Therefore, some quite sexist values were passed down from that era such that the naked chest of a man was quite acceptable, including the nipples. Unfortunately, these ideas are still with us and women's groups have fought for years to make breast-feeding in public as acceptable as it is in France and other parts of Europe.Therefore, a lady's nipples are still taboo on mainstream television. A few years ago there was a commercial for a Laboratoire Garnier shower product. The commercial featured a very fast shot of one naked breast, including nipple. The commercial was shown o! nly once. The channel (Channel 4) received 99 complaints from the public and decided not to re-broadcast it....Show more

Lita Thammorongsa: good question......hmmm... i have no idea

Bell Pasco: Can only show 1 woman's breast at a time.

Danica Timperman: probably because its known to be nude because its on breasts. but really its stupid

Thursday, June 18, 2020

How (literally) does a woman lose her baby while unconscious?  

How (literally) does a woman lose her baby while unconscious?  

answers 0:Does she go in labor, or do doctors typically give her a cesarean? i keep hearing this situation, but the fact that they have to ask if the baby is okay, makes me think that they can't 'feel' that they've lost it. that doesn't make sense to me, so i wanted to ask.thank you.answers 1:do you mean like it died or it was delivered and is just not in mama anymore. i had a c-section and was awake till the moment my hubby showed her to me then I passed out for 2hrs 3 days of labor and only 2 hrs of sleep sad any way when I woke up my first questions was is my baby ok and when is she going to come out I got really weird looks but I was so dead tired that I couldn't remember the past 24hrs I still only remember bits and pieces. Its kinda hard to tell if you got the drugs your still num! b a few hours after the surgery so if you pass out or are just to exhausted you dont remember a whole lot or even feel your body the way you normally would...answers 2:In general, if the mom isn't at some kind of risk that makes it critical to get the deceased baby out quickly, they prefer to induce labor. C-sections are primarily to benefit the health of the *infant*, and when that's not an issue anymore, they'd rather minimize the risk to the mother. Sometimes this is done while the woman is under so-called "twilight sedation"... which is basically what you get when you have to have dental surgery. It's not full unconsciousness but you don't really remember or feel aware of what's going on. Other times it's done while awake.Your body is able to expel a baby without a lot of intentional effort on your part. The contractions are powerful enough that "pushing" just tends to speed things up. Women used to deliver while fully unconscious back in the Victorian era, so it'! s totally possible. And yes, there's no internal awareness of! whether your kid is alive or dead when they aren't moving. This can be very unsettling in late pregnancy: sometimes the baby tends to sit still for longer periods as it gets closer to its due date since there's less room for it to move....

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Can i get a small paragraph on television?

Jonelle Eligio: What?

Rebeca Mckin: I think you mean a "short" paragraph, unless you are typing it in small point font, lol.How about this?Television is often called "America's babysitter" as many parents use television to keep their children occupied, and busy or out of trouble.This is not to say that these are bad parents, they too grew up with free television, taking in a signal that came in on the air, like radio does.It's been around the USA since the early 1950's. Back then, most cities had only one TV station, then two and three. Today, many people pay for TV using cable lines, and have dozens of choices about what to watch.Back long ago, more than 1/2 the nation often watched the same news stations, sharing the opinions of experienced commentators. More than one-half the nation shared common experiences by watching the same shows.But, today, with so many choices, it's often common, that the most popular shows only have a viewing audience of less than 10 p! ercent of total population.Even popular shows like American Idol, seldom have more than 1/3rd of the total audience, all others are watching cable news, movie channel, sports, and other choices on TV.(I think this is about 15 lines, your bro should finish the speech with a conclusion, about whether the changes today are good or bad)...Show more

Finger nail problem.?  

Finger nail problem.?  

answers 0:I can't drop chewing my finger nails what do I doanswers 1:Go to the drugstore and buy a little bottle of a product that you put on your nails, and it makes them taste really bad, and so discourages this habit. As the pharmacy where this product is located; I'm not sure which aisle it's in. Could be with toothpaste/dental products. So if you can't find it on your own, ask.Keep your fingernails very short as well. Less to chew on. Good luck! :)...

What is the latest radio friendly song.?

Myriam Hetjonk: lol any song on the radio is radio friendly...the radio station filters and edits the explicit songs to make 'em radio-friendly. even the "as long as my *****es love me" song by lil wayne is edited to be radio friendly.

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

Comment faire pour enraciner le Samsung Galaxy onglet 3

Comment faire pour enraciner le Samsung Galaxy onglet 3

p>Rooting the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 vous permettra de libérer de l’espace de stockage et de la mémoire, augmenter la durée de vie de la batterie, installer des applications personnalisées, et d’augmenter les performances de votre tablette Android. Vous pouvez installer votre Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 à l’aide du logiciel Odin sur n’importe quel ordinateur sous Windows.

Naviguez sur le site Web d’Odin au http://odindownload.com/, et sélectionnez l’option pour télécharger la dernière version d’Odin sur votre ordinateur. Actuellement, la dernière version d’Odin est Odin 3.10.

Sauvegardez toutes les données personnelles sur votre tablette en utilisant Samsung Kies, les serveurs de Google, votre ordinateur ou un service de stockage en nuage tiers. L’enracinement effacera toutes les données personnelles de votre tablette.

Tap! ez sur le bouton de commande Précédent jusqu’à ce que vous reveniez au menu « Réglages ».

Tapez sur « Système », puis sur « A propos de l’appareil ».

Naviguez sur l’un des sites Web suivants pour télécharger le package d’enracinement pour votre Samsung Galaxy Tab 3, en fonction du numéro de modèle de votre tablette.

Vérifiez que votre Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 a une autonomie d’au moins 80 %. Le processus d’enracinement peut prendre jusqu’à plusieurs minutes et nécessite une autonomie de batterie presque complète sur votre appareil.

Tapez sur « Applications », puis sur « Développement ».

Connectez l’onglet 3 de Galaxy à votre ordinateur à l’aide d’un câble USB. Odin prendra un moment pour détecter votre appareil, et affichera « Added » dans la boîte de message Odin.

Cliquez sur « Galaxy Tab », sélectionnez votre numéro de modèle, puis cliquez sur « Get Downloads ».

Notez le numéro de modèle de votre Galaxy Tab 3. Vous devre! z vous référer au numéro de modèle lorsque vous téléchargerez le pack d’enracinement approprié pour votre appareil.

Placez les cases à cocher à côté de « Auto Reboot » et « F.Reset Time » dans Odin.

Décochez la case à côté de « Répétition », puis cliquez sur « Démarrer ». Odin commencera à enraciner votre appareil, ce qui peut prendre jusqu’à plusieurs minutes à compléter.

Tapez sur Menu, puis sur « Paramètres ».

Déconnectez l’onglet 3 de Samsung Galaxy de votre ordinateur. L’application SuperSU s’affichera dans la barre d’état de l’application et votre appareil sera maintenant rooté.

Appuyez sur la touche Volume fort. Votre tablette entrera en mode Téléchargement.

Cliquez avec le bouton droit de la souris sur le fichier Odin.exe sur votre bureau, et sélectionnez « Exécuter en tant qu’administrateur ».

Cochez la case « Mode de débogage USB ». Cela vous permet! d’apporter des modifications à votre tablette après avoir connecté l’appareil à votre ordinateur via USB.

Cliquez sur le bouton « PDA » dans Odin, et sélectionnez le fichier racine que vous avez téléchargé précédemment pour votre modèle Galaxy Tab 3.

Suivez les instructions à l’écran pour installer Odin sur votre ordinateur. Le programme se lancera automatiquement après l’installation.

Sélectionnez l’option pour télécharger et installer les derniers pilotes pour votre Galaxy Tab 3 sur votre ordinateur. Ces fichiers sont nécessaires pour aider à compléter le processus d’enracinement.

Naviguez sur le site officiel de Samsung à l’adresse http://www.samsung.com/us/support/downloads.

Enregistrez le fichier Odin.zip sur votre bureau, puis double-cliquez sur le fichier pour en extraire le contenu.

Attendez que « Pass » s’affiche dans la boîte de message Odin. Cela indique que l’enracinement a réu! ssi.

Appuyez simultanément sur les boutons Volume faible, Accuei! l et Alimentation de votre tablette et maintenez-les enfoncés. Un message d’avertissement s’affiche à l’écran.

Does Anyone Know Where I Can Find A Poll On Communism?

Elvin Weichbrodt: Here's a poll. http://www.gallup.com/poll/125645/socialism-viewed...It's alot more than 2%. lol*EDIT*Sorry I couldn't find any on anarchism or communism specifically....Show more

Bernadette Roel: No the Pol's over threw Communism years ago

Kellie Waycott: Not Pols(Polish people) Polls(like opinion polling)PS thanks for the poll on socialism but are there any polls on communism or anarchism specifically?

Monday, June 15, 2020

Comment faire des rouleaux de saucisses

Comment faire des rouleaux de saucisses

Déposer les petits pains sur une plaque à pâtisserie et les cuire au four pendant 15 à 20 minutes. Disposer les rouleaux de saucisses sur une plaque à pâtisserie en les séparant d’au moins 2,5 cm (1 po). Mettre la feuille dans le four préchauffé et cuire les rouleaux de saucisses au four jusqu’à ce qu’ils soient dorés et que la pâte soit gonflée. Retirer et servir les petits pains encore chauds.

Mélanger la farce aux saucisses de porc. Utilisez une grande cuillère ou vos doigts pour combiner les ingrédients dans le bol. La saucisse de porc doit être complètement combinée avec les assaisonnements. Mettre le bol de côté pendant que vous roulez la pâte feuilletée.

Faire rouler chaque rectangle sur les saucisses et les fermer hermétiquement. Rassembler l’extrémité de la pâte la plus proche de la saucisse et l’enrouler sur la vian! de. Continuer à rouler jusqu’à ce que vous atteigniez la fin du rectangle avec le lavage des Å"ufs. Répétez cette opération pour chaque rectangle.

Préchauffer le four à 400 °F (204 °C) et sortir la pâte feuilletée. Saupoudrez un peu de farine sur votre comptoir et déroulez 2 feuilles de pâte feuilletée décongelée d’un paquet de 18 onces (500 g).

Répartir le mélange de saucisses entre les 2 rectangles. Diviser le mélange de saucisses en 2 parties et rouler chaque partie en un rouleau long et étroit. Chaque portion de saucisse doit être presque aussi longue que le rectangle.

Battre 1 Å"uf et couper 8 saucisses courtes en deux dans le sens de la longueur. Casser 1 Å"uf dans un petit bol et le battre à la fourchette. Réserver le bol et mettre 8 courtes saucisses aux herbes sur une planche à découper. Couper chacun en deux dans le sens de la longueur.

Cuire les petits pains de saucisses au four de 25 à 30 minutes. Mettre la p! laque dans le four préchauffé et cuire les petits pains jusq! u’à ce que la pâte soit gonflée et dorée. Retirer les rouleaux de saucisses et les servir encore chauds.

Préchauffer le four à 400 °F (204 °C) et faire une lessive aux Å"ufs. Casser 1 Å"uf dans un petit bol et le fouetter à l’aide d’une fourchette. Réserver le lavage à l’Å"uf pour l’assemblage des rouleaux de saucisses.

Faire sauter les champignons pendant 5 minutes. Mettre 2 c. à soupe (28 g) de beurre dans une poêle et tourner le brûleur à feu moyen. Incorporer 1 1 1/3 tasse (100 g) de champignons de Paris hachés finement et cuire jusqu’à ce qu’ils ramollissent. Éteindre le brûleur et transférer les champignons dans un bol.

Déposer la saucisse sur la pâte et plier la pâte. Étendre chaque longue portion de saucisse dans le sens de la longueur le long de l’extrémité de chaque rectangle de pâte. Tremper ensuite un pinceau à pâtisserie dans le bain à l’Å"uf et le badigeonner le long du bord opposé de la pâte.! Tenez le bord de la pâte qui est à côté de la viande et repliez-le. L’aligner avec le bord opposé et appuyer fermement pour que la pâte se referme.

Badigeonner les extrémités des rectangles d’Å"uf et disposer les saucisses. Tremper un pinceau à pâtisserie dans l’Å"uf battu et badigeonner 1 extrémité de chaque petit rectangle. Placer une saucisse à l’autre extrémité de chaque rectangle.

Couper chaque rectangle en 8 petits rectangles. Couper chaque grand rectangle en deux à l’aide d’un couteau tranchant. Faites la coupe dans le sens de la longueur, puis coupez 8 rectangles plus petits de chaque pièce.

Ajouter le Worcestershire, le Tabasco, le thym et la saucisse dans le bol. Verser 1 c. à soupe (15 ml) de sauce Worcestershire et 1 c. à soupe (15 ml) de sauce Tabasco dans le bol. Ajouter 1 c. à soupe (4 g) de thym séché, 1 livre (450 g) de chair à saucisse, du sel et du poivre.

Marquer le dessus de chaque rouleau et l! es badigeonner d’eau aux Å"ufs. Retirer la plaque à pâtisserie du r! éfrigérateur et utiliser un couteau tranchant pour couper des fentes diagonales sur le dessus de chaque rouleau de saucisses. Tremper ensuite un pinceau à pâtisserie dans le bain aux Å"ufs et le badigeonner sur chaque pâte.

Couper chaque rouleau de pâte en 8 à 10 rouleaux de saucisse individuels. À l’aide d’un couteau aiguisé ou d’un grattoir, couper chacun des rectangles de pâte en petits pains de saucisses individuels. Pour les petits rouleaux, couper chacun en 10 morceaux. Couper plusieurs bandes diagonales sur le dessus de chaque rouleau de saucisses.

Réfrigérer les rouleaux de saucisses pendant 20 minutes. Placer chaque rouleau de saucisse assemblé sur une plaque à pâtisserie et mettre la plaque au réfrigérateur. Réfrigérer les rouleaux jusqu’à ce que la pâte durcisse.

Rouler 2 feuilles de pâte feuilletée décongelée en 2 grands rectangles. Sortir un paquet de pâte feuilletée décongelée de 450 g (16 oz) et déposer ! chaque feuille sur une surface enfarinée. À l’aide d’un rouleau à pâtisserie, rouler chaque pâte jusqu’à ce qu’elle mesure environ 45 x 30 cm (18 x 12 po).

Rouler chaque feuille de pâte feuilletée en un grand rectangle. Utilisez un rouleau à pâtisserie et roulez chaque feuille dans un rectangle de 19 x 12,5 po (48 x 32 cm).

Saupoudrer la saucisse de sel, de poivre et de thym. Assaisonner la saucisse avec autant de sel et de poivre que vous le souhaitez. Répandre ensuite 1 petite poignée de feuilles de thym frais sur les saucisses.